There are two things that immediately come to mind when I
think of the film “Rebecca.” The first is that it was one of the few VHS tapes
we owned when I was kid. At some point, someone had squashed the case when it
was vacant of the tape, leaving it mangled and bent out of shape. In an effort
to repair the damage, the guilty party placed several evenly spaced strips of
black electrician’s tape across the front of the case to help retain its
rectangular shape. The tape created this venetian blind effect, isolating the
darkened stares of Mrs. de Winter and Mrs. Danvers in the famous scene where
the latter tries to convince the former to leap to her death. As a kid, I found
these intense stares looking out at me between the strips of black tape sort of
unnerving, which gave me serious pause before firing up the VCR to ever watch
“Rebecca.”
However, when I did finally get around to watching
“Rebecca,” I remember finding it a tad boring, a conclusion owing more to my
age than to the film itself, I’m sure. The one thing that did hold my interest
was the surname of the protagonist couple: de Winter. This name made me think
of Wint O Green Lifesaver candy, which became so embedded in my thoughts that I
couldn’t think of much else happening onscreen. Heck, Mrs. Danvers could have
could have pushed Mrs. de Winter from a window, gone off and married Maxim and
I probably still would have continued to daydream about Wint O Green Lifesavers.
Needless to say, it has been good to revisit “Rebecca” as an
adult to construct a new set of memories and appreciate the film beyond its
apparent subliminal message about impulse-buy candy. Directed by Alfred
Hitchcock and toplined by Laurence Olivier and Joan Fontaine, “Rebecca” was
nominated for 11 Academy Awards, taking home three, including the Oscar for
“Best Picture” in 1940. Produced by the indefatigable David O Selznick, “Rebecca”
signaled Hitchcock’s American directorial debut and would go one to become the
Master of Suspense’s only film to win “Best Picture.” I find this notably
ironic for two reasons. The first is that “Rebecca” is a gothic yarn skipping
hand-in-hand with a psychological thriller, which doesn’t land neatly inside
the brand of suspense that the name Hitchcock would become synonymous with.
What’s more, Hitchcock’s later success with classics like “Rear Window,” “North
by Northwest” and “Psycho,” have nudged “Rebecca” so far to the edge of the
spotlight that it’s scarcely remembered when discussing Hitchcock films. Yet,
it was the only one of his pictures to breakthrough and collect the top honors.
Judith Anderson (left) torments Joan Fontaine in "Rebecca." |
Shortly after their wedding, the de Winters make their way
to Manderley, Maxim’s sprawling estate. But Mrs. de Winter’s qualities soon
leave her floundering in the role as mistress of Manderley, as the entire
mansion is seemingly monogrammed with memories of Rebecca. She, in turn,
possessed all the star qualities that elude Mrs. de Winter version 2.0, leaving
her to feel inadequate compared to Rebecca’s legend. Perhaps no one whips up
these comparisons more forcibly than the house keeper, Mrs. Danvers. Gliding
through Manderley’s corridors like a vampire with perfect posture, Mrs. Danvers
evokes the image of an evil stepmother, jealous that Cinderella has married the
prince. As such, her efforts are focused on sabotaging the happiness of the de
Winters to protect the legacy of her precious Rebecca.
One of the unique aspects about “Rebecca” is that the
action, the characters, the entire narrative, are so affected by a singular
individual, which the audience never even gets a glimpse of. Yet due to her
overarching influence on the lives of everyone in the story, Rebecca seemingly
lives on, coursing through the veins of the memories of others. (It somewhat
reminded me of Alexander Payne’s “The Descendants,” in that regard.) You come
to judge Rebecca, to feel you know what type of a woman she is, particularly
because those singing her praises are less than savory characters. But it’s
clever storytelling to reveal the central antagonist strictly through the descriptions
of others because it allows the viewer to construct a sublimely malicious
creature.
But I think what gives Rebecca gravity to be a threat is
that she represents the past, which can be the most menacing villain of all.
The past is ubiquitous and relentless in its attack on the present in trying to
destroy the future. Sometimes the villainous past can take form in those still
living, which in this case is the stoic Mrs. Danvers. Judith Anderson serves up
a deliciously creepy performance as Manderley’s house keeper from hell.
Rebecca’s ability to be everywhere is seemingly matched only by Mrs. Danver’s
similar ability to be lurking at every corner. Her wish to do Rebecca’s bidding
from beyond the grave makes the entire film shiver, allowing Anderson to steal
the picture.
Just as a side note, several modern critics have speculated
that the character of Mrs. Danvers was obsessed with Rebecca to the point of
sexual attraction. However, I don’t completely agree with this assessment. To
me, her obsession with Rebecca seems more founded upon a notion that Mrs.
Danvers vicariously derived from Rebecca all of the female qualities she wished
she possessed but never did. I feel like behind Mrs. Danvers’ sinister stare is
her fossilized soul, created from years of being ignored and undervalued for her
lack of beauty and gaiety. However, the opportunity to attend to the beauty and
care of a shining star like Rebecca allowed Mrs. Danvers to internalize some of
the credit for Rebecca’s social successes. In mourning Rebecca, I think Mrs.
Danvers is also mourning the loss of her direct line to splendor and
exquisiteness, leaving her once again a wretched and overlooked housekeeper.
Apart from Anderson, Olivier and Fontaine also turn in
wonderful performances as a mismatched couple attempting to take cover from the
past, instead of confronting it head on. I particularly enjoyed watching
Fontaine’s Mrs. de Winter evolve from being an awkward thing to finding her
feet and taking up courage to stand on them to support Maxim, as he eventually
turns to face Rebecca. Apparently, David O Selznick tried to drum up publicity
by recreating a casting frenzy for the role of Mrs. de Winter, a la Scarlett
O’Hara for “Gone with the Wind.” He set up screen tests for a parade of
actresses, including Anne Baxter, Margaret Sullivan and Joan Fontaine’s sister,
Olivia de Havilland, a move which only served to add fuel to their legendary sibling
rivalry. But in the end, Hitchcock adored Fontaine, staking his reputation on
her by claiming he could get the performance out of her.
Joan Fontaine and Laurence Olivier embrace in "Rebecca." |
Like most Hitchcock films, the true star is Hitchcock
himself, who had an incredible talent for pacing a story to maximize the
mystery and suspense. He employs a gift for never sacrificing plot for mood,
dialogue for action, instead coaxing every element of story to perform exactly
as he wishes. If Adam Smith had been a film critic, upon reviewing any of
Hitchcock’s films he most certainly would have written about an invisible
Hitchcockian hand guiding his pictures from start to finish. Nothing about a
Hitchcock film seems sloppy or extraneous. They always feel whipped into shape
and “Rebecca” is no exception. And while it may not contain a slasher shower
scene or a climatic finish on Mount Rushmore, the power of “Rebecca” lies in
its peculiar subtleties, chilling you like a stare from Mrs. Danvers behind a
piece of black electrician’s tape.
Favorite Line: Maxim
de Winter first meets his future wife in Monte Carlo, where she is working as a
companion to the wealthy and obnoxious Edythe Van Hopper. The two engage in
conversation, with the future Mrs. de Winter sitting by quietly, when Maxim
asks her directly if she is enjoying Monte Carlo. Before she has a chance to
respond, Mrs. Van Hopper elbows her way back into the conversation, prattling
on before eventually saying, “Most girls would give her eyes for a chance to
see Monte.” To which Maxim dryly responds, “Wouldn’t that rather defeat the
purpose?”
Agreed - Wint O Green lifesavers are pretty distracting. Great analysis, though! I might just pull Rebecca off my shelf of unread books.
ReplyDelete