My utterly, unscholarly snapshot review of “Mutiny on the Bounty” is that it rocks the party. I can’t believe that 32 years have lapsed before I finally got around to watching this film. In fact, I
can’t believe I haven’t even really heard anything about it before. I kind of
feel like people have been holding out on me or something. I know there must be
someone I know who knows this movie is epic and maddening and glorious and just
hasn’t told me about it. Well whoever they are, they should know they’re
in big trouble for not bringing “Mutiny on the Bounty” to my attention earlier.
It truly is that rare film that has managed to avoid the destructive elements of time to still be thoroughly entertaining and watchable, even by
contemporary standards. Directed by Frank Lloyd and starring Clark Gable and
Charles Laughton, “Mutiny on the Bounty” was nominated for eight Academy Awards
in 1935, walking away with only the top prize. Apparently, it is the last film
to win Best Picture without winning an Oscar in any other category.
The titular mutiny erupts on the HMS Bounty, which set sail
in 1787 from Portsmouth, England to Tahiti. Its mission: Collect 1,000 breadfruit
trees and deliver them to West Indies for the purpose of providing cheap food
for the slaves there. The ship is captained by the odious William Bligh, a
brutal tyrant with an obsessive streak for administering harsh punishment at
every infraction. Even in death, members of Captain Bligh’s crew can’t escape
their due penalties as, at one point, he insists upon a dead sailor still
receiving his two dozen lashings.
The yin to Captain Bligh’s yang is embodied by Fletcher
Christian, the Bounty’s lieutenant, who disapproves of his superior’s governing
methods. It’s this disapproval that eventually pushes Christian to rally the
men to mutiny against Captain Bligh and those loyal to him. The mutineers send
the lot of them adrift in a life boat on their merry way toward the blue
horizon, before turning the Bounty around back toward the paradises of Tahiti.
Captain Bligh and his band survive their ordeal, eventually reaching the Dutch
West Indies. Thirsty for revenge, Captain Bligh returns to Tahiti, but fails to
capture Christian, leaving his sense of crime and punishment in tattered frustrations.
Captain Bligh really is a villain for the ages. He came in
ranked number 19 on AFI’s list of the greatest 100 Heroes and Villains, which puts
him ahead of such classic cinema baddies like the Terminator, Freddy Krueger
and Cruella de Vil. I mean come on, if you’re worse than a woman whose ambition
is to skin puppies in the name of fashion, you must be pretty bad.
I think a lot of the credit for why one would brew such a strong repellent sense toward Captain Bligh belongs to Charles Laughton’s dedicated performance. For starters, Laughton looks physically villainous, but in a completely out-of-the-box sort of way. He possesses a total ham face, adorned with a giant grey wart perched like some moldy cherry on top of a melted sundae. His posture is slumped diagonally forward, pushing his face outward in a way that makes it appear as though in a permanent state of beady scrutiny
But Laughton doesn’t just rely on looks alone, or lack
thereof, to make Captain Bligh so detestable. He has this effortless ability to
project a smugly superior countenance. However, due to his authoritative demeanor, it feels like a countenance
completely fueled by a sinister “revenge of the nerd” mentality that one would
imagine was forged over several years in the harsh social trenches of a high
school setting. But despite his best efforts to reinvent himself into a sea captain,
the reality seems as though Captain Bligh is doomed to retain his status as an awkward
outcast, try as he might. This is evident at the end of the film when, upon
learning of his behavior on the Bounty leading up to the mutiny, his equals and
superior officers regard him as though he were just an intolerable odor bringing shame to the gang.
Moreover, his seething anger in failing to apprehend Fletcher Christian seems to reinforce his inner tortured socially discordant self because Clark Gable is the comparative opposite: good looking,
athletic and effortlessly popular with everyone. In a way, it's as if the jocks are still emerging triumphant.
Clark Gable, left, and Charles Laughton in "Mutiny on the Bounty." |
Apart from loathing Captain Bligh, the film’s story is thoroughly
engaging because at the heart of it all is the enduring question of whether it
is acceptable to defy lawful authority. In “Mutiny on the Bounty,” I think the case is
made in the affirmative, as Captain Bligh is so over-the-top in his abuse of
powers that it crosses the line of what is legal. Adding to this sense of affirmation is the trial of several of the mutineers,
an event which the film implies led to revised attitudes among the leadership of the
Royal British Navy regarding the way crews should be governed. In effect, if it
were not for the mutiny on the Bounty defying lawful authority, reforms might not have been called for as quickly as they were.
On an unrelated note, during the opening credits of “Mutiny
on the Bounty,” I noticed that the film was edited by a woman named Margaret
Booth. This caught my attention because I suspect that not many women were
given the opportunity to cut together a major Hollywood film in the 1930s.
Given the time period, it would seem like the field of film editing would have
largely been dominated by men. A quick Google search reveals that Booth had
started out working for D.W. Griffith before moving to MGM, where she
ultimately established a career that spanned nine decades. Curiously, her only
nomination sprung from her superb efforts in “Mutiny on the Bounty.”
Thankfully, she was later awarded an honorary Oscar for her lifetime
achievement. However, nothing I read delved into whether she faced any gender
discrimination early on in her career, which would be interesting to research.
I wonder if she is sort of the Amelia Earhart of the film editing world.
Somewhere in there is a good documentary.
To wrap up, anyone who loves movies should take the worthwhile voyage on“Mutiny on the Bounty” at
least once. It truly is a great cinematic ride for the ages. And if
anyone tries and tells you differently, then I suggest raising a mutiny of your
own in protest to such irresponsible criticisms.
Favorite Line: In
a conversation with Fletcher Christian and other high ranking members of the
Bounty, Captain Bligh sarcastically replies to one of his colleagues, “You
would have made an excellent historian. You have a profound contempt for
facts.”
Was it really that good? You just sold me on this, kid. :)
ReplyDeleteHey there! I just watched this movie tonight. Would be interested to hear your take on my thoughts! :-)http://watchingallbestpictures.wordpress.com/2013/05/16/8-mutiny-on-the-bounty-1935/
ReplyDelete